Obesity represents a significant public health challenge on a global scale, with its prevalence increasingly linked to socio-economic factors, most notably family income. This study investigates the relationship between family income and several obesity measures specifically, the Body Shape and Size Index (BSSI), Body Mass Index (BMI), Body Surface Area (BSA), Ponderal Index (PI), Weight/Body Mass (BM), and Height within a sample of 9,906 respondents from Pakistan. Utilizing descriptive statistics and p - values, the analysis aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of how variations in income affect these obesity indicators, ultimately informing potential public health interventions. The findings reveal a complex, variable association between family income levels and obesity measures that differs by the specific obesity index examined. For BSSI, individuals in the lowest income bracket demonstrated higher values (indicating greater adiposity), while for BMI and weight, higher income brackets showed elevated values. These mixed findings suggest that the direction of association depends critically on which obesity measure is analysed. The study reveals that lower-income families are more likely to face barriers in accessing nutritious food, engaging in physical activity, and achieving favourable health outcomes. This situation is often exacerbated by economic constraints that drive families toward caloric-dense, nutrient-poor food choices. The implications of this research are far-reaching, emphasizing the need for targeted public health strategies to address obesity, particularly among economically disadvantaged populations. The study advocates for policies that enhance food security, improve access to health-promoting resources, and create supportive environments for physical activity. Through a nuanced exploration of these relationships, the research aims to contribute valuable insights to the field of public health, promoting equity in health outcomes and addressing the root causes of obesity in Pakistan.
Background: Obesity is one of the most pressing global health challenges, with over one billion people now living with the condition worldwide. In Southeast Asia, nearly 40% of the population is projected to be overweight or obese by 2035, with Thailand reporting prevalence exceeding 42%. Intensive Lifestyle Modification (ILM) combined with Meal Replacement (MR) has emerged as a promising strategy for achieving sustainable weight loss, supported by landmark trials including the Diabetes Prevention Program, Look AHEAD, and DiRECT.Objective: To illustrate the clinical effectiveness of ILM combined with MR through detailed case presentations documenting anthropometric outcomes at baseline, 8 weeks, and 52 weeks, contextualized within international obesity management guidelines and comparative research across diverse populations. We hypothesized that selected participants undergoing the ILM+MR intervention would demonstrate clinically significant weight loss (≥5% of initial body weight) sustained through 52 weeks, with concurrent improvements in waist circumference indicating reduced central adiposity.Methods: Twelve participants (9 female, 3 male) from the ILM+MR arm of a previously published retrospective cohort study (n = 702) were selected based on complete longitudinal data and representativeness. The intervention comprised structured nutritional counseling, soy-based MR (220 kcal per serving, twice daily for 8 weeks), behavioral modification with group therapy, and physical activity guidance aligned with the 2013 AHA/ACC/TOS guidelines. Body weight and waist circumference were measured at baseline, 8 weeks, and 52 weeks.Results: Mean total weight loss was 38.2 kg (35.3% of initial body weight), with mean waist circumference reduction of 13.0 inches (33.0 cm) over 52 weeks. All 12 participants achieved clinically significant weight loss (>5%), substantially exceeding the 5–10% threshold recommended by international guidelines. Weight loss occurred in two phases: a rapid intensive phase (mean 14.0 kg during weeks 0–8) followed by continued loss during maintenance (mean 24.2 kg during weeks 8–52). All participants completed the 52-week follow-up.Conclusion: This case series demonstrates the potential for substantial, sustained weight loss through ILM+MR intervention, supporting findings from the larger Thai cohort study and international research including the DiRECT trial and systematic meta-analyses. These results reaffirm the foundational role of comprehensive lifestyle programs and highlight their relevance as scalable, culturally adaptable interventions for obesity management across diverse populations.
I am to express my view that Heighten Science Publications are reliable quick even after peer review process. I hope and wish the publications will go a long way in disseminating science to many inter...
College of Fisheries, CAU(I), Tripura, India
Ajit Kumar Roy
Regarding to be services, we note that are work with high standards of professionalism translated into quick response, efficiency which makes communication accessible. Furthermore, I believe to be muc...
Amélia João Alice Nkutxi
I would like to thank JPRA for taking this decision. I understand the effort it represents for you. I'm truly happy to have the paper published in JPRA. And I'll certainly consider JPRA for my next pu...
Emmanuel BUSATO
You are such a nice person. Your journal co-operation is very appreciable and motivational.
Department of Biotechnology, Uttaranchal college o...
Archna Dhasmana
Publishing with the International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology was a rewarding experience as review process was thorough and brisk.
Their visibility online is second to none as...
Elizabeth Awoyesuku
I do appreciate for your service including submission, analysis, review, editorial and publishing process. I believe these esteemed journal enlighten the science with its high-quality personel.
Bora Uysal
Your journal co-operation is very appreciable and motivational. I am really thankful to your journal and team members for the motivation and collaboration to publish my work.
Assistant Professor, UCLAS Uttaranchal University,...
Archna Dhasmana
“The choice to submit the forensic case study to the Journal of Addiction Therapy and Research was dictated by the match between the content and the potential readership. The publication process pro...
Elisabeth H Wiig
To the editorial team at HSPI and the Journal of Clinical Nephrology:
Thank you so much for your hard work and collaboration in bringing our article to life. Your staff was responsive, flexible, and ...
Alejandro Munoz
Many thanks for publishing my article in your great journal and the friendly and hassle-free publication process, the constructive peer-review, the regular feedback system, and the Quick response to a...
If you are already a member of our network and need to keep track of any developments regarding a question you have already submitted, click "take me to my Query."