Dasaradharami Reddy K*, Anusha S, Ashalatha N and Mohammed Azharuddin Ahmed
Published on: 30th September, 2026
The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the development and application of artificial intelligence (AI) across disease surveillance, epidemiological forecasting, medical imaging, prognosis, drug discovery, vaccine research, contact tracing, and public-health decision support. This review synthesizes the literature on these applications while critically examining the evidence needed for translation into clinical and public-health practice. A structured literature-search and selection framework was used to organize evidence published from the emergence of COVID-19 through the contemporary literature, with emphasis on peer-reviewed studies and recent reviews. The evidence was synthesized according to the pandemic-response pathway: early warning and surveillance; diagnosis and differential diagnosis; severity and prognosis; clinical and resource decision support; therapeutic and vaccine discovery; genomic surveillance; and privacy-preserving and responsible AI. Across these domains, AI demonstrates potential to process heterogeneous data and support time-sensitive decisions, but reported performance does not by itself establish clinical utility. Recurring limitations include small or non-representative datasets, dataset shift, limited external validation, class imbalance, information leakage, insufficient calibration and interpretability, privacy and security risks, and uncertainty about workflow integration and regulatory accountability. Recent systematic reviews also indicate that multimodal, federated, and privacy-preserving approaches remain less developed than conventional centralized models. The principal contribution of this review is a unified critical framework that links technical performance with data quality, external validation, clinical relevance, fairness, privacy, interpretability, and implementation readiness. The review therefore identifies not only where AI has been applied to COVID-19, but also the conditions required for responsible translation to clinical practice and future pandemic preparedness.
Your service is excellent. Processing and editing were very fast. I hope to publish more of my works in your journal.
Ausraful Islam
I hope to ability to make some new investigation and publish in Your Company in future.
Artur Stopyra
The services of the journal were excellent. The most important thing for an author is the speed of the peer review which was really fast here. They returned in a few days and immediately replied all o...
Eastern Mediterranean University, Cyprus
Zehra Guchan TOPCU
Your services are very good
Chukwuka Ireju Onyinye
Publishing an article is a long process, but working with your publication department made things go smoothly, even though the process took exactly 5 months from the time of submitting the article til...
Anas Diab
The service is nice and the time of processing the application is fast.
Department of Neurosurgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospit...
Long Ching
I think that Heighpubs very good. You are very helpful. Thank you for everything.
Ana Ribeiro
I do appreciate for your service including submission, analysis, review, editorial and publishing process. I believe these esteemed journal enlighten the science with its high-quality personel.
Bora Uysal
It was a great experience publishing through JCICM. The article has reached out to several institutions. Appreciate your professional work. Hope to work with you again
Anas Wardeh
Regarding to be services, we note that are work with high standards of professionalism translated into quick response, efficiency which makes communication accessible. Furthermore, I believe to be muc...
If you are already a member of our network and need to keep track of any developments regarding a question you have already submitted, click "take me to my Query."