Njolle Belle Alice, Fankep Dihewou Alphonse Bertin, Mohnchimbare Christina Mbongueh and Kamga Fouamno Henri Lucien*
Published on: 4th June, 2026
Background: Malaria and typhoid fever remain major public health problems and important causes of febrile illness in sub-Saharan Africa, particularly in urban settings characterized by poor sanitation, unsafe water supply, overcrowding, and persistent malaria transmission. The clinical manifestations of both diseases frequently overlap, making accurate diagnosis difficult and often leading to empirical treatment, inappropriate antimicrobial use, and delayed patient management. This study assessed the occurrence, associated risk factors, and clinical implications of malaria–typhoid co-infection among febrile patients attending the Camrail Medical Center in Douala, Cameroon. Methods: A hospital-based analytical cross-sectional study was conducted among 220 febrile patients recruited systematically at the outpatient department. Data were collected using structured questionnaires, clinical assessment forms, and laboratory investigations. Malaria infection was diagnosed using standard parasitological methods, while typhoid fever was assessed using routine laboratory procedures. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and multivariate logistic regression in SPSS version 25. Results: Malaria mono-infection accounted for 31.8% of cases, typhoid mono-infection for 10.9%, and malaria–typhoid co-infection for 15.5%, whereas 41.8% of participants had neither infection. Significant predictors of co-infection included unsafe water sources (AOR = 3.12; p = 0.001), poor food hygiene (AOR = 3.85; p < 0.001), non-use of bed nets (AOR = 2.21; p = 0.021), and exposure to stagnant water (AOR = 2.76; p = 0.004). Co-infected patients experienced significantly more severe clinical manifestations, including high fever, vomiting, diarrhea, abdominal pain, and headache. Age-stratified analysis showed a higher proportion of co-infection among participants aged ≤25 years (18.8%) compared with those aged ≥26 years (12.9%), although the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.194). Gender-based analysis demonstrated no significant association between sex and infection category (p = 0.606).Conclusion and recommendations: Malaria–typhoid co-infection remains a significant public health concern in Douala. Integrated diagnostic approaches, improved environmental sanitation, safe water access, food hygiene promotion, and strengthened malaria prevention measures are essential to reducing the burden of co-infection and limiting inappropriate antimicrobial use.
“The choice to submit the forensic case study to the Journal of Addiction Therapy and Research was dictated by the match between the content and the potential readership. The publication process pro...
Ph.D, Boston University Department of Communicatio...
Elisabeth H. Wiig
Thank you very much. I think the review process and all of what concerns the administration of the publication concerning our paper has been excellent. The nice and quick answers have been very good I...
Doris Nilsson
Thank you very much for your support and encouragement. I am truly impressed by your tolerance and support.
Thank you very much
Diaverum: PADC, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
Nasrulla Abutaleb
Your service is excellent. Processing and editing were very fast. I hope to publish more of my works in your journal.
Ausraful Islam
I think that Heighpubs very good. You are very helpful. Thank you for everything.
Ana Ribeiro
Regarding to be services, we note that are work with high standards of professionalism translated into quick response, efficiency which makes communication accessible. Furthermore, I believe to be muc...
Amélia João Alice Nkutxi
I would like to thank JPRA for taking this decision. I understand the effort it represents for you. I'm truly happy to have the paper published in JPRA. And I'll certainly consider JPRA for my next pu...
Emmanuel BUSATO
Publishing an article is a long process, but working with your publication department made things go smoothly, even though the process took exactly 5 months from the time of submitting the article til...
Anas Diab
I would like to mention that I had a wonderful experience working with HSPI. The whole process right from manuscript submission to peer review till the publication of the article was very prompt & eff...
Amarjeet Gambhir
We thank to the heighten science family, who speed up the publication of our article and provide every support.
If you are already a member of our network and need to keep track of any developments regarding a question you have already submitted, click "take me to my Query."